Verse of the Day

Book Reviews

 

  • Calvin And The Biblical Languages (Mentor)
    by John D. Currid

    Currently reading...(for Hebrew 2 with Dr. Mark Futato)

     
  • Paul and Palestinian Judaism: A Comparison of Patterns of Religion
     
  • A Dance with Dragons: A Song of Ice and Fire: Book Five
    by George R.R. Martin

    Review of this book written by Jeff VanderMeer, Special to the Los Angeles Times | July 12, 2011

    George R.R. Martin's "A Dance With Dragons," the fifth book in the hugely popular Song of Ice and Fire fantasy series, is one of the most anticipated novel of the last few years. In the four previous volumes of this sprawling fantasy epic, which was inspired by England's War of the Roses in the 1400s, Martin has captivated readers with complex story lines, fascinating characters, great dialogue, perfect pacing, and the willingness to kill off even his major characters. His readers now number in the millions and a recent HBO series — "Game of Thrones" — based on the first installment in the series faithfully showcases all of Martin's strengths.

    Was "A Dance With Dragons" worth the six-year wait? Absolutely. Indeed, Martin's decision to release a sizable chunk of his story-in-progress as the fourth installment — the underrated "A Feast for Crows" (2005) — now seems wise and actually generous to readers. Originally intended for release as one novel, "Feast" and "Dance" overlap in terms of the time period covered, but they are vastly different. "Feast" chronicled aftermath, the dying fall after the great battle that ended the third book, "A Storm of Swords." But "A Dance With Dragons," which overtakes "Feast" chronologically after about 600 of its 1,000 pages, functions more as a novel about exploration and quests.

    Several narrative threads in "Dance" document the attempts of suitors to reach the city of Mereen. They hope to vie for the hand of the dragon queen Daenerys Targaryen, heir to the Iron Throne, the seat of power on the continent of Westeros. A quest of sorts also accretes around the popular character Tyrion Lannister, whose absence from "Feast" irked some readers. Exiled from his homelands for a grievous crime, Tyrion is in fine form in "Dance," witty, devious, smart, and getting into all sorts of trouble. Other favorites from the first three books also return, including Bran Stark, the clairvoyant boy called to the north of Westeros by a three-eyed crow from a vision.

    Martin's love for sophisticated, deeply strange fantasy permeates "Dance" like a phantasmagorical fever dream. Bran's arrival at the crow's sanctuary contains some of the wildest, most beautifully alien scenes in the series. Even Tyrion's journey in a boat sailing down a haunted river, replete with ghost boats and thick fog, provides thrills for jaded readers: "The drowned city was all around them. A half-seen shape flapped by overhead, pale leathery wings beating at the fog.") Martin's brilliance in evoking atmosphere through description is an enduring hallmark of his fiction, the settings much more than just props on a painted stage.

    But perhaps most impressive is Martin's understanding of how powerful people often rule under ever-increasing constraints, exemplified by Daenerys and Jon Snow, commander of Westeros' northern Wall. Jon's forces are the only defense against strange undead creatures headed south during the approaching winter. To fulfill his sworn duty to the Wall, Jon must resist the demands of an army come to the wall's defense and ignore his birthright as heir to a kingdom. Daenerys, meanwhile, rules an occupied city whose elites oppose her decision to free their slaves. Her dragons, the main source of her power, have grown less and less obedient. Every decision she makes seems to take her further from her goal of reclaiming the Iron Throne. On some level, Jon and Daenerys are trapped and must ask themselves difficult questions. What is the nature of duty? Which sacrifices support a greater good and which do not? When is an act of mercy actually an act of cruelty? By novel's end, Jon and Daenerys arrive at similar answers but vastly different destinies. Daenerys' fate in particular yields one of the most powerful scenes in the entire series.

    Some reviewers have compared Martin's work to that of J.R.R. Tolkien or even William Shakespeare, but the truth is a little more complex. The Song of Ice and Fire novels work so well because the epic fantasy is grounded in a strong horror element and because Martin skillfully conveys the gritty (often bawdy) physicality of the world while moving, with equal effectiveness, between various levels of society. Martin also owes a debt to the dark yet humane cynicism of writers like Jack Vance, even though he cares much more about the inner life of his characters than Vance. Martin's devotion to fully inhabiting his characters, for better or worse, creates the unstoppable momentum in his novels and contains an implied criticism of Tolkien's moral simplicity.

    Having overcome the writerly challenges of a series grown longer than expected — and having survived the well-documented hostility of those readers who have displayed a grotesque sense of entitlement over publication delays — Martin seems poised in the last two books to bring home one of the best series in the history of fantasy.

    Original review posted here.

     
  • God's Word in Human Words: An Evangelical Appropriation of Critical Biblical Scholarship
    by Kenton L. Sparks

    I must begin this review with a confession. This is the first (definitely not the last) book that I have read specifically dealing with historical-criticism. What I think will make this one so unique is that it is written by an evangelical for evangelicals that does not land exactly where one might expect. The book stretched me in more ways than I thought it would and I must admit that it was refreshing to think through the issues presented by the author. I feel like I was raised in a tradition that applauded believers for how far they could stick their head in the sand, which was put forth as great faith. Later in life I have learned that faith is really the result of deep soul searching thought and not the lack thereof. With that said, Sparks proposes a lot to think about, so let me be clear: if you are not willing or in a place right now to wrestle through the issues raised by modern Biblical scholarship then do not read this book. However, if you are looking for an intro into the way that the scholarly world views Scripture (and how one may respond to them on their own terms) or have yourself noticed the way that we evangelicals are highly critical of ancient secular writings without submitting our own sacred texts to the same scrutiny, then this book will be a good place to start.  

    Sparks does hold to the inerrancy of God, just not the inerrancy of humans. So he would state that we should not be afraid to see human err in Scripture because God was not afraid to adopt it in His sovereign method of conveying His Word to us. He would also argue that since God was not compelled to correct errant views of ancient science or tradition (flood, creation, etc.) then neither should we see these as obstacles of faith in submitting to the authority of Scripture (should science prove otherwise). I would say that one of Sparks main points of the books can be summed up in this quote: 

    “That God speaks inerrantly, and that he therefore speaks inerrantly in Scripture, cannot be doubted by any Orthodox Christian. But when this doctrine is affirmed in the context of Enlightenment modernism [Sparks is a practical realist], the result is not only that God is inerrant; the result must be that the human beings who wrote the Bible offer us indubitable and incorrigible knowledge wholly free from the foibles of human error. This version of inerrancy is mistaken for it wrongly assumes that the human grasp on the truth--especially important religious truths--can and even must be perfect and absolute.” Instead, he would suggest that God has not only spoken to us in His special written Word (Scripture), but also in His created order (general revelation, i.e., science) and church tradition (the continual work of the Spirit in the church). 

    Regardless of where you begin or where you end, I think this book could open the door for wrestling with these issues so that you can better rest in your faith from a well-thought through perspective. I do not think that he was one hundred percent clear with all of his implications or reasonings, but that may have been an intentional result of his practical realism. With that said, I must admit that I still have a lot of studying to do and reading to accomplish before I can go toe-to-toe with Sparks and grapple on his level of hermeneutical interpretation. 

     
  • Communicating for a Change: Seven Keys to Irresistible Communication
    by Andy Stanley, Lane Jones

    I have to say that I really enjoyed this book. I heard Andy Stanley preach about 10 years ago and I can still tell you the point of his sermon. This example embodies the entire theme of the book. It is about how pastors can communicate effectively to their congregation in a way that is engaging and memorable. No where in the book does he tell you what to preach or not to preach, simply how to preach it. The way he writes made it easy to follow and a quick read. I have never been a fan of "preacher voices" and this book emphasized a very relational way of getting your point across to people in an effective and efficient way. I have always admired pastors or speakers that I felt were really "talking to" me, as opposed to those that I felt were "talking at" me. Also, the basic outline that he encourages the reader to follow allows the average person in the pew to track with the speaker the whole time without getting lost or confused about the entire point of the preachers sermon. It should be noted that no where in the book does he suggest that simply because the sermon no longer resembles an exercise in exegetical gymnastics performed for seminary professors that the communicator should do any less preparation for communicating God's truth. The main downside I would have with the book, unless intentionally worked against, is that one may have the tendency to prepare "principle" heavy messages, as opposed to "Person" heavy sermons. In other words, the pastors job is not to point people to principles, but rather to Christ. Personally, I have always felt inadequate in transferring biblical truth into a relatable sermon and this book gave me some great things to think about and many guidelines to follow in doing so. 

     
  • TRICKS OF THE MIND
    by DERREN BROWN

    Well, I must admit that I have always had a fascination with tricks, not just what you would think of when you hear "Pick a card," but also the mental math feats and sleight of hand variety. I had seen TV programs and YouTube videos featuring the author, and I have to say that my admiration for how and what tricks he is able to pull off led to me devouring this book in no time. His writing style and humor make the read very enjoyable. Although he did not give a step-by-step break down of how he does his most jaw-dropping, head-scratching tricks, he was brutally honest concerning the mind set or ideas behind why they work as well as they do. If any of you are the least bit interested in this kind of thing, I would highly recommend it. 

    All that aside, this is the second book I have recently finished where the author took the opportunity of writing his book to speak out against spirituality/God/religious believers. Browns book was much more upfront about this issue and spent a good deal explaining why he was no longer a "True Believer" (as he puts it) or a Christian. So I am thinking that I should probably brush up on my own apologetics, and try to read some of the books that have influenced him. For example, he highly recommends books by Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion or Sam Harris, A Letter to a Christian Nation. Now my first thoughts toward the challenges by Brown to read these books that are going to oppose my beliefs are things like, "These are just going to cause distracting doubts in my relationship with Christ," or "why should I go to the devil to learn more about God." However, I can also reason that if there do exist areas where I am "sticking my head in the sand" then I should address them, also if I can better understand how others think, then I can be better equipped to meet them where they are at (not that I think anyone can be 'talked into' coming to Christ). What do you think?

     
  • Where Men Win Glory: The Odyssey of Pat Tillman
    by Jon Krakauer

    I've read other books by Jon Krakauer and enjoyed them thoroughly. What I have enjoyed most about this book is he goes into quite a bit of history which has led up to the war now in Afghanistan and what was concurrently happening in Pat Tillman's life. I must admit that I knew very little of this war-torn country's past. Not only did I love his writing style, but also feeling educated about world events. If you are a "die-hard" fan of the Bush administration then you will probably have trouble stomaching much of what is revealed (and would not have other-wised been revealed). Personally, I agree with Derrek Webb: 

    I’m so tired of these mortal men
    with their hands on their wallets and their hearts full of sin
    scared of their enemies, scared of their friends
    and always running for re-election
    so come to DC if it be thy will
    because we’ve never had a savior on Capitol Hill

    you can always trust the devil or a politician
    to be the devil or a politician
    but beyond that friends you’d best beware
    ’cause at the Pentagon bar they’re an inseparable pair

    I am not entirely cynical, however neither am I overly naive to what I hear from politicians. They cannot be where we place our trust. But back to the book, I like how the story was told and would have loved to have had coffee with Pat, or gone for a hike. I would be curious how he responded to my faith, since he was openly atheistic. If you have an interest in a brief history of Osama bin laden, Taliban, and Al-Quaida or a man who walked away (repeatedly) to millions of dollars in the NFL to defend his country and ideals for the greater good then this is a must read! I mean, come on, it's Jon Krakauer.

     

     
  • Preaching Christ from the Old Testament: A Contemporary Hermeneutical Method
    by Sidney Greidanus

    I have been reading this one for awhile now (Kindle edition on my Ipod), and it has been amazing. I am about half way through it and I am looking forward to how he lays out one must correctly preach Christ from the Old Testament. The first half so far has been a look at how the church has historically done so, good and bad. 

     
  • Basic Judaism (Harvest Book.)
    by Milton Steinberg

    I have started reading this in preparation for having dinner with an old friend of mine. Both her and her husband were once Christians, but about 6 years ago converted to Judaism. They both come from ethnically Jewish families. They invited me over for dinner, so I want to be more read up on where they are now coming from as Orthodox Jews. 

     
  • Gospel-Driven Life, The: Being Good News People in a Bad News World
    by Michael Horton

    This book was given to me for a group of men in our parish to read together. I actually exercised some of my speed reading skills or lack thereof on this one. I had to have it done in order to discuss it with  the group so I thought that the gist of the book would be better than nothing. My thoughts: The author made some really good points at times and it is spattered with nuggets of truth. I would not have a problem recommending it; however, his overall point is hard to find. Considering that he is a systematic theology professor, his writing style (at least for this particular book) was all over the board. Thus, for someone reading his overarching message for the first time might get a little lost in the constant change of topics. Overall, not a bad message, but I think it has been written better in other books. (See: most anything by Tozer or Piper) 

     
  • The Heart of Evangelism
    by Jerram Barrs

    currently reading...taking longer than I thought....and I am realizing that may be because the author has yet to really say anything new or in a way that would really hold one's attention. I have heard only great things about Dr. Barrs, including that he is wonderful professor in the nearby Covenant College. However with this particular book, I am going to need to skim ahead if I really want to finish it. But I haven't given up on it, I do plan to see it through. 

     
  • More Than Money More Than Faith; Successfully Raising Missionary Support in the Twenty-first Century
    by Paul Johnson

    Even though this book was mandatory reading for the upcoming I&O, I can now see why and am very pleased that I read it. The author begins with his own story as a missionary struggling to maintain adequate support for his family while on the field. He then outlines a major misconception that many have towards financial support, which is that the missionary should pay little regard to raising any support and rather focus on having enough "faith" for God to miraculously provide (without any leg work on the missionary's part). He soundly debunked this belief as erroneous both historically and biblically. The aspect of the book that I took the most away from and will need to work hard at keeping in the for front of my mind over the next year, will be the constant perception that we are trying to develop a team of partners to invest in us and our ministry. This would be in contrast to the idea that our goal in "raising support" is to just get money. As much as we will need financial support to pay bills (rent, groceries, utilities, gas, cost of ministry, life insurance, worker's compensation insurance, health insurance, Social Security, retirement, plus a % assessment to the organization), we just as importantly need strategic partners to help encourage, effectual prayer, and wise counsel. I am sure that I will return countless times to various chapters of the this book throughout our time as missionaries.